Since we identify as Baptists, it seems scripturally clear that we can trace our lineage back to John (hello somebody) the Baptist. The forerunner of Jesus, even before there was thought of any possible apostolic succession to Peter. Some may still sport clothing made of camel’s hair and love honey but less seem to enjoy the delicacy of locusts. Perhaps that is to our spiritual disadvantage. (Was John still eating locusts when he had doubts?)
Even though Particular Baptists believe in particular atonement (that Christ died only for the elect) and General Baptists hold to general atonement (that Christ died for all people), there must be plenty agreed upon for both to claim being Baptist. No one seems to be fighting over who is more Baptist. Rather just where we split the hairs.
We must remember: Even though the Spirit of God has worked through men—such as John Calvin, Jacobus Arminius, and others—to help define systems of theology, the authority, the origin, should always point us back to the (66 books of) inspired scriptures. These men (along with many other brothers and sisters) are not why something is true or false.
It is important to note: (1) Our theology should not be based solely on another man’s theology and (2) The defense of our theology is not proved by the weak arguments or slandering of another man who holds a different theology. We should not be merely repeaters of an echo chamber of which we agree, but rather, at some point, our beliefs should be found in our faith, springing forth from the Holy Spirit working in us as we read, study, ruminate, and memorize the word of God.
So, whether we be Generals or Particulars, we can embrace the unity in scripture and base our sparring on the word of God, ensuring we see fellow Christians as our brothers and sisters and not as enemies.
For additional reading if desired:
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Baptist/History
CnC.Today 